Thermal ablation for hepatic tumors in high-risk locations.

Thermal ablative techniques such as radiofrequency and microwave ablation are minimally invasive and cost-effective approaches that are currently being adopted as alternatives to surgical resection for primary and metastatic liver malignancies. However, they are considered to be relatively contraindicated for tumors in high-risk locations due to technical difficulties and a perceived increased risk of perioperative complications. Several techniques, including artificial ascites, non-touch multibipolar ablation, and laparoscopically assisted ablation, can be used to improve the outcomes of ablation for high-risk tumors. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the techniques currently used to improve thermal ablation outcomes for high-risk liver tumors.

A pathologic scoring system for predicting postoperative prognosis in patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of pathological factors to predict the prognosis of patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is unclear. We aimed to develop and validate a novel scoring system based on pathological factors to predict the postoperative survival of patients with rHCC. METHOD: Patients with rHCC who underwent hepatectomy were recruited from three hospitals and allocated to the training (n = 221) and validation (n = 194) cohorts. A new scoring system, namely the MSE (microvascular invasion-satellite foci-Edmondson Steiner) score, was established based on three pathological factors using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, including microvascular invasion, satellite foci, and differentiation grade. Finally, patients were stratified into three groups based on their risk of prognosis (low, intermediate, or high) according to their MSE score. We also constructed MSE score-based nomograms. The performance of the nomograms was assessed by receiver operating characteristic and calibration curve analyses and validated using the validation cohort. RESULTS: Three pathological factors were significantly correlated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), three of which were included in the MSE score. The score can clearly stratify rHCC patients after hepatectomy (P < 0.05). And we established nomograms based on the MSE score (MSE score, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, and alpha-fetoprotein concentration) to predict postoperative OS and RFS in patients with rHCC. The nomograms showed good discrimination, with C-indices over 0.760 for OS and RFS at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The calibration curve showed excellent nomogram calibration, which was also verified in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The clinical MSE score were accurate in predicting OS and RFS in patients with rHCC with resectable lesions after hepatectomy.

A Novel Nomogram to Predict Resectable Gastric Cancer Based on Preoperative Circulating Tumor Cell.

INTRODUCTION: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been suggested to have an important prognostic role in gastrointestinal tumors. We developed a preoperative CTC-based nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with resectable gastric cancer after surgery and established a risk stratification system based on the nomogram. METHODS: From January 2012 to June 2017, we screened 258 patients with gastric cancer treated with surgery from one center as the training cohort and 133 patients with gastric cancer treated with surgery from another as the validation cohort, screened prognostic factors for the training cohort using univariate and multivariate Cox risk proportional models, created predictive overall survival (OS) and a recurrence-free survival (RFS) nomogram, and plotted the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve for this nomogram in the training and validation cohorts. Risk score stratification was performed according to the nomogram, and OS curves were plotted for the low, medium, and high-risk groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The CTC positivity rate was 78.5% in all patients. CTC, TNM stage, and Ki-67 were the prognostic factors affecting OS and RFS after gastric cancer surgery. The nomogram consisted of these 3 variables. In the training group, the area under the curve of the nomogram for OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 0.918, 0.829, and 0.813, respectively, and the area under the curve for RFS was 0.900, 0884, and 0.839, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in OS among the low, medium, and high-risk groups according to the risk stratification system constructed from nomogram scores ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Two nomograms based on preoperative CTC were established to predict OS and RFS after resectable gastric cancer. The 2 nomograms had good discrimination and calibration and significant stratification ability of the risk stratification system established according to them.

Prognosis and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy for BCLC stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma with clinically significant portal hypertension: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The latest Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system suggests considering surgery in patients with resectable BCLC stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy for BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients with CSPH. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 647 HCC patients in BCLC stage 0/A who were treated at five centers between January 2010 and January 2019. Among these patients, 434 underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy, and 213 underwent open hepatectomy. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare the overall survival (OS) rate and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate between patients with and without CSPH before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for BCLC stage 0/A patients, and subgroup analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Among the 434 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy, 186 had CSPH and 248 did not. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the OS and RFS rates were significantly worse in the CSPH group before and after PSM. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified CSPH as a prognostic factor for poor OS and RFS after laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, CSPH patients treated laparoscopically had a better short- and long-term prognosis than those treated with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: CSPH has a negative impact on the prognosis of BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients after laparoscopic hepatectomy. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is still recommended for treatment, but careful patient selection is essential.

Risk Factors of Positive Resection Margin in Hepatectomy for Resectable Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Risk Prediction and Prognosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clinical work has revealed that hepatectomy for resectable ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) has a relatively high percentage of positive resection margins found in postoperative pathology. It is necessary to evaluate the risk factors associated with R1 resection in patients undergoing hepatectomy for rHCC. METHODS: A total of 408 patients with resectable rHCC originating from three centers undergoing surgery from January 2012 to January 2020 were consecutively enrolled in the study to study the prognostic impact of R1 resection using Kaplan-Meier plotting of survival curves. One center with 280 served as the training group, and the other two centers served as the validation group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis screened for variables affecting R1 and developed prediction models, and the models were tested in the validation cohort using the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and calibration curves. RESULTS: The prognosis of rHCC patients with positive cut margins was worse than that of patients with R0 resection. Risk factors for R1 resection were tumor max length (OR = 2.668 [1.161-6.131]), microvascular invasion (MVI) (OR = 3.655 [1.766-7.566]), times of hepatic inflow occlusion (1/0:OR = 2.213 [1.113-4.399]; 2/0:OR = 5.723 [2.010-8.289]) and timing of hepatectomy (OR = 5.284 [2.394-9.661]), using tumor max length, times of HIO, and timing of hepatectomy to construct the nomogram, the area under the curve of the model was 0.810 (0.781-0.842) and 0.782 (0.752-0.805) in the training and validation groups, respectively, and the calibration curve of the model was basically on the 45° line. CONCLUSIONS: This study constructs a clinical model to predict R1 resection after hepatectomy for resectable rHCC, which can be used to better plan perioperative strategies for the incidence of R1 resection during hepatectomy.

A nomogram for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is defined as the presence of micrometastatic cancer cell emboli in hepatic vessels, including small vessels, and at present, researchers believe that is an important factor for early postoperative recurrence and survival. Here, we developed and validated a preoperative predictive model for the presence of MVI in patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data for 210 rHCC patients who underwent staged hepatectomy at Wuhan Tongji Hospital, and 91 patients who underwent staged hepatectomy at Zhongshan People's Hospital between January 2010 and March 2021. Then, the former was used as the training cohort and the latter was used as the validation cohort. Logistic regression was used to screen for variables associated with MVI, and these variables were used to construct nomograms. We used R software to assess the discrimination, calibration ability, as well as clinical efficacy of nomograms. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified four risk factors independently associated with MVI: max tumor length [odds ratio (OR) = 1.385; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.072-1.790], number of tumors (OR = 2.182; 95% CI, 1.129-5.546), direct bilirubin (OR = 1.515; 95% CI, 1.189-1.930), and alpha-fetoprotein (cutoff = 400 ng/mL) (OR = 2.689; 95% CI, 3.395-13.547). Nomograms were built from the four variables and they were tested for discrimination and calibration, and the results were good. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a preoperative predictive model for the presence of MVI in patients with ruptured HCC. This model can help clinicians identify patients at risk of MVI and make better treatment options.

Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) on early-stage HCC following hepatectomy: What's the impact?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The impact of currently clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) for patients with early-stage HCC after surgery remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to understand the specific effect of CSPH on patients with early-stage (BCLC A stage) HCC after surgery. METHODS: We collected data from 386 HCC patients treated at two centers from December 2009 to January 2017.224 patients (all treated by hepatectomy) were in BCLC stage A, of which, 122 had no CSPH, and 102 had CSPH. There were 162 patients in BCLC stage B (who underwent surgery, TACE, and conservative treatment). The prognosis of the CSPH and non-CSPH groups in BCLC stage A was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. We used multivariate Cox regression to analyze prognostic factors in patients in BCLC stage A and compared the prognosis of the two groups with the BCLC stage B group. RESULTS: Among the 224 BCLC stage A patients after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the CSPH group were worse than those of the non-CSPH group (P < 0.001, HR = 2.340[1.554-3.523]; P < 0.001, HR = 2.577[1.676-3.812]) The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model indicated that CSPH was an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS in BCLC stage A patients. BCLC stage A patients with CSPH treated by hepatectomy had a comparable prognosis to BCLC B stage patients (P = 0.378), and the OS and RFS (P = 0.229; P = 0.077) in the CSPH (BCLC A) group were also comparable to BCLC stage B patients treated with surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: CSPH can affect the surgical prognosis of early-stage (BCLC stage A) HCC. BCLC stage A patients with CSPH have a prognosis comparable to patients with BCLC stage B. An additional stage, such as the BCLC stage A-B, can be considered.

Comparison of the prognosis of BCLC stage A ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched landmark analysis.

BACKGROUND: At present, the choice of treatment modalities for ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients in BCLC stage A remains controversial, and this study compared the overall survival of ruptured HCC patients undergoing TACE or hepatectomy. METHODS: A total of 283 ruptured HCC patients treated at our liver surgery center were included in our study, of which 175 were treated with hepatectomy and 108 were treated with TACE. To reduce selection bias, we used a propensity score matching (PSM) model, which yielded a total of 88 pairs of patients. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the long-term prognosis, and the Landmark method was used to compare the short-term and long-term prognoses of patients after PSM. Finally, we performed subgroup analysis according to whether it met the Milan criteria. RESULTS: After PSM, in the hepatectomy group, the 1-, 3-, and 5 year OS rates were 73.4%, 45.4%, and 33.9%, respectively. In the TACE group, the 1-, 3-, and 5 year OS rates were 58.5%, 40.6%, and 23.2%, respectively. Within one year, the hepatectomy group had a better prognosis than the TACE group (P = 0.022), but there was no difference in long-term survival(P = 0.936). In the subgroup analysis, in patients who met the Milan criteria, the survival curve indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the survival prognosis between the two groups (P = 0.294) HR = 1.56(0.68-3.59); in the patients beyond the Milan criteria, the survival time was 28.0 months (20.0-34.0) in patients who underwent hepatectomy and 18 months (9.8-26.2) in patients who underwent TACE, and the survival curve indicated a statistically significant difference (P = 0.043) HR = 1.57(1.01-2.43). CONCLUSION: Our propensity score-matched study found that ruptured HCC patients treated by hepatectomy had a better short-term prognosis than those treated by TACE, but there was no difference in the long-term prognosis between the two treatment groups.

Early-Stage Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Different Tumor Diameters: Small Tumors Have a Better Prognosis.

Background and Aim: Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is classified as T4 according to the TNM staging system with a very poor (does not achieve expected) prognosis, which has always been controversial. This study aimed at assessing the specific impact of different tumor diameters on the posttreatment prognosis of BCLC stage 0/A rHCC patients. Methods: Data from 258 patients with BCLC stage 0/A HCC treated in our center from January 2008 to December 2017 were collected, including 143 rHCC patients and 115 patients with non-ruptured HCC (nrHCC). With the help of X-tile software, we determined the cutoff value of the tumor diameter in patients with rHCC. Using 8 cm as the cutoff, we divided rHCC patients into Small-rHCC (n = 96) and Large-rHCC (n = 47) groups, compared the prognoses of the S-rHCC and L-rHCC groups, as well as the prognoses of the two groups with the nrHCC group using the Kaplan-Meier method, and screened the prognostic factors of rHCC patients using the multivariate Cox risk model. Results: The OS of the S-rHCC group was significantly higher than that of the L-rHCC group [HR = 2.41 (1.60-3.63)], and the OS of the nrHCC group was comparable to that of the S-rHCC group (P = 0.204). In patients treated with surgery only, OS and RFS were also comparable in the S-rHCC nrHCC group. Meanwhile, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the main method of treatment were also prognostic factors for OS in patients with rHCC. Conclusions: Ruptured HCC with a relatively small diameter (≤8 cm) can also achieve the same prognosis as nrHCC patients after aggressive treatment. It is also not recommended to include all patients with rHCC in stage T4.

Alpha-Fetoprotein+Alkaline Phosphatase (A-A) Score Can Predict the Prognosis of Patients with Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma Underwent Hepatectomy.

Background: This research is aimed at establishing a scoring system alpha-fetoprotein+alkaline phosphatase (A-A score) based on preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and to investigate its clinical significance in patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) after hepatectomy. Methods: 175 ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with hepatectomy were included. Survival analysis was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were analyzed in a multivariate model. Preoperative serum AFP and ALP values are assigned a score of 1 if they exceed the threshold value and 0 if they are below the threshold value, A-A score is obtained by summing the scores of two variables (AFP, ALP), and the predictive values of AFP, ALP, and A-A score were compared by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, and subgroup analyses were performed to further evaluate the power of A-A scores. Results: Of the 175 patients, 67 (38.3%) had an A-A score of 0, 72 (41.1%) had an A-A score of 1, and 36 (20.6%) had an A-A score of 2. In multivariate analysis, the A-A score, the BCLC stage, and the extent of resection were independent predictors of OS in patients with rHCC. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and RFS in patients with an A-A score of 1 were better than those with an A-A score of 0 and worse than those with an A-A score of 1 (all p < 0.05). Based on the results of ROC analysis, the A-A score is superior to AFP or ALP alone in predicting the prognosis of patients with ruptured HCC. In subgroup analysis, A-A score could accurately predict the prognosis of patients with or without microvascular invasion (MVI) and with different Child-Pugh grades or gender. Conclusions: The A-A score can effectively predict the prognosis of patients after hepatectomy of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. At the same time, it also has good evaluation ability in different subgroups.

Hepatectomy for ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A: The optimal treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) generally has a very poor prognosis and is currently classified as T4 in the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the actual impact of rHCC, as well as the positive effect of hepatectomy in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A rHCC. METHODS: We enrolled 86 patients with rHCC after surgery and 526 patients with non-rHCC after surgery or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the postoperative prognosis of patients with rHCC with that of patients with non-rHCC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors affecting patient survival. RESULTS: BCLC stage 0/A rHCC treated with surgery had a worse prognosis than BCLC stage 0/A non-rHCC treated with surgery (overall survival [OS]: hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12 [2.24-4.34], P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival [RFS]: HR = 2.26 [1.65-3.09], P < 0.001). Rupture was an independent prognostic factor in patients with BCLC stage 0/A rHCC (OS: HR = 1.685 [1.416-2.006], P < 0.001; RFS: HR = 1.484 [1.267-1.737], P < 0.001), and patients with BCLC stage 0/A rHCC who underwent surgery had a comparable prognosis to patients with BCLC stage B HCC who underwent surgery or TACE (OS: P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Patients classified as having BCLC stage 0/A rHCC can achieve comparable outcomes to patients with BCLC stage B HCC after hepatectomy. However, not all patients with rHCC should be classified as T4 in the TNM staging system.

Effect of Perioperative Blood Transfusion on the Postoperative Prognosis of Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Different BCLC Stages: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Background and Aim: The effect of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) on the prognosis of patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages is not clear. We identified the independent predictors of PBT for postoperative rHCC and investigated the effects of PBT on the prognosis of patients with rHCC at different BCLC stages. Methods: A total of 340 patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for rHCC between January 2010 and March 2018 were abstracted from the databases of two centers. A total of 166 patients underwent PBT. The prognosis of patients who received PBT and those who did not was compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in different BCLC stages. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were also used to identify independent predictors of PBT. Results: We divided the 340 patients into two groups: early tumor stage (BCLC-A) n = 196 and advanced tumor stage (BCLC-B/C) n = 144. Overall, the median survival time of the PBT group was lower than that of the nonPBT group before and after PSM. However, in the BCLC-BC group, the prognosis of patients with PBT was not statistically different from that of patients without blood transfusion. Univariate Cox analysis showed that PBT was a risk factor affecting the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in BCLC-A, and PBT was not a risk factor for poor OS and RFS in BCLC-B/C. Conclusion: Perioperative blood transfusion has a negative impact on the postoperative prognosis of patients with rHCC in the early stage, but has no significant impact on the postoperative prognosis of patients with rHCC in the advanced stage.

Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status of Research.

BACKGROUND: Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is considered a rare and life-threatening manifestation; when it happens, it often requires acute and positive intervention. At present, the mechanism of rHCC development is gradually being understood while there are many kinds of rHCC treatment. From our clinical observation, the prognosis of rHCC patients is not as poor as it is currently believed. It may not be appropriate to include all patients with rHCC in T4. MAIN BODY: The incidence of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma is now rising. Especially in the Asian region, it can even reach 10% - 15%. The most common symptom of HCC rupture is abdominal pain, and there are now a variety of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma rupture. With aggressive treatment, rHCC patients can also achieve a better prognosis. The patient's condition varies on admission, so the treatment methods will also be different. It is critical to identify prognostic factors simultaneously, and rHCC can be effectively managed by focusing on important prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: A review was carried out to analyze diagnosis, mechanism, treatment, and prognostic risk factors on this disease condition during the current situation; it is hoped that it will provide better guidance for clinicians. Moreover, patients with rHCC were managed hierarchically to prolong their prognosis.

The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been previously reported that inflow occlusion does not affect postoperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. However, for patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma(rHCC), the effect of hepatic inflow occlusion and the number of occlusion times on the prognosis is unknown. METHODS: 203 patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this study. They were first divided into the non-hepatic inflow occlusion (non-HIO) group and the hepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Patients in the HIO group were further divided into one-time HIO and two times HIO groups. KM method was also used to compare the two groups. Finally, independent risk factors affecting RFS and OS were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULT: In the non-HIO group, 1-,3- and 5-year OS rates were 67.0%, 41.0%, and 22.0%respectively, and RFS rates were 45.0%, 31.0%, and 20.0% respectively; In the one-HIO group, the 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 55.1%, 32.1%, and 19.2% respectively, and RFS rates were 33.3%, 16.7%, and 7.7% respectively; In the two-HIO group, 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 24.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively, and RFS rates were 8.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively. By Cox regression analysis, HIO was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis in rHCC patients. CONCLUSION: One time hepatic inflow occlusion did not affect postoperative OS, but negatively affected the RFS of rHCC patients; two times hepatic inflow occlusion negatively affected the postoperative OS and RFS in patients with rHCC.

Juvenile granulosa cell tumor in pregnancy: case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy complicated with juvenile granulosa cell tumor (JGCT) is very rare; thus, the experience on clinical diagnosis and management is limited. CASES: Two patients presented with abdominal pain, two were incidentally discovered, one by ultrasonography, and one during a caesarian section. One case received an emergency caesarian section because of tumor rupture at 38th week's gestation, the rest were treated at full term and no abnormalities were detected in the newborns. Three cases received further staging surgery, two of which received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. No patient had recurrent disease after a follow-up period spanning from 13 to 57 months. CONCLUSION: In the absence of emergency, surgery can be delayed without affecting the fetus. More research is needed to determine the value of chemotherapy in FIGO stage I patients.

Retrospective analysis of clinicopathological characteristics of 19 ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumor cases.

AIM: To describe the clinical and pathological characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of juvenile granulosa cell tumor (JGCT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 19 patients with histopathologically confirmed juvenile granulosa cell tumors treated in two medical centers in Wuhan city of China between 1999 and 2019. RESULTS: Totally, 19 patients were included during the period. The median age at diagnosis was 8.25 years (range, 0.25-28 years). The most common clinical presentation was abdominal pain, five out of 10 prepubertal children presented with precocious puberty. Three patients underwent radical surgery (including total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy), the other 16 patients had fertility-sparing surgery (cystectomy or ipsilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without omentectomy and lymphadenectomy). Eighteen patients had the international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) stage I tumors, one patient had FIGO stage II disease. Twelve patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up time from the time of diagnosis was 35 months (range, 13-250 months). One patient experienced relapse and died of the disease 32 months after the initial diagnosis. Eighteen patients were alive and had not experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. The reproductive age patients that received fertility-sparing surgery had regular menstruation. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of JGCTs are diagnosed as FIGO stage I tumors and have favorable clinical outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy seems to improve outcomes for patients with advanced-stage JGCTs; however, the value of chemotherapy in stage Ic patients is still unknown. Fertility sparing surgery should be considered in young patients who wish to bear children.